“Do-gooder” SNP MP, Pete Wishart, wants the government to RELAX IMMIGRATION LAWS and follow in America’s footsteps by banning the deportation of widows as there is “no room for discretion”.

His pressure on the government is due to an Indian widow who WILLINGLY left Scotland with her children after her husband died.

In 2004, Mr Navjot Singh and his wife Nidhi arrived in Perth with their first daughter, who was 3 at the time. They had a second daughter here in Scotland.

Current immigration rules state that they would be able to permanently live in the UK next month. However, Mr Singh died earlier this year.

Mrs Singh agreed to return to her homeland of India as if she was to stay here she would be here, in Scotland, illegally.

Mr Wishart is now DEMANDING a change in the immigration laws and has roped in, Leader of the House and Minister for Equality, Harriet Harman.

He said, “The Singh family are in a dreadful situation.

“I am appalled by what has happened and this shows how bureaucratic and rigid the rules are.”

“Mrs Singh has a degree in electronics and communications and has a useful contribution to make to the Perthshire community.

“Her children have started their education here and know no other country.

“Mrs Singh should be allowed to come back to the UK without being subject to this officious nonsense.

“What we need is a system that works on behalf of families placed in this particular and unusual situation.”

“The rigid bureaucracy of the new points based immigration system must be reconsidered immediately to avoid situations as difficult as this one.

“As it currently stands, there is no room for discretion.

“Ending the deportation of widows and widowers is a sensible and reasonable measure which will spare grieving families’ heartache.”

So Mr Wishart, first off you have already done what we expect from the SNP and lied. As Mrs Singh’s eldest daughter DOES know another country – India where she was born and where they are residing now.

Mrs Singh wasn’t even deported she WILLINGLY left to go back to India. The SNP are so desperate to disenfranchise the Scots they would bring someone back to Scotland, who, under the law, shouldn’t even be living here!

As we mentioned in an earlier post, we have a family member who has just had a child and can’t get a council house in Glasgow, even though they have worked since leaving school and both pay their taxes. But I’m sure a home would be available to these people as it is for countless other non-native people.

What other ideas does Mr Wishart have to revamp immigration legislation? What about letting people in who have the same surname as non-Brits who live in Britain? Or what about letting people in who used to live in the same city? Or even people who have the same hairstyle? Of course this is preposterous.

The law is the law and if we let everyone in to Britain, or back into Britain, who had a sob story then we would be living in a country that was seriously overpopulated with no countryside and little resources.

The reality is that we can no longer keep the population of this country at such a high level.

Ed. – The picture in the post was edited for the entertainment of the reader.

Ex speaker of the House of Traitors, Michael Martin, will be given a peerage and sit in the House of Lords despite being the first speaker to be thrown out of the job in 300 year!

I guess it’s a case of who you know, not what you know!

Even sleaze watchdogs have said that this move could damage the reputation of the House of Lords.

The House of Lord Appointments Commission sent a letter to Gordon Brown about Mr Martin’s expenses and his performance in the House of Traitors and the fact that he had been sacked.

But Mr Martin’s friend, Mr Brown, ignored these concerns and secretly nodded through a motion asking the Queen to approve the peerage.

The nomination of Mr Martin was pushed through with the help of Harriet Harman and fully backed by Gordon Brown.

A spokesperson for the Prime Minister said that the decision to award the peerage was “’an uncontested motion that went through the House.”

Well there’s no surprise there then because there was no vote on the issue!

Not only will Michael Martin be able to claim £25,000 in overnight expenses but he will also claim £3,000 in office costs and a juicy £1.4 million pension pot.

Of course, Mr Martin won’t get his peerage with all the other “common” people. He will get his own private audience with the Queen with a possible ban on the media.

It is said that Mr Brown gave Mr Martin a peerage so that he would retire from his role as speaker of the House of Traitors in a bid to restore public confidence in MP’s after their dishonourable abuse of the taxpayer’s purse in expenses.

Mr Martin’s claims included taxi fares to the tune of £4,000 which included chauffeur rides to Celtic Park football club and a job centre!

The House of Lords Appointments Commission advised Gordon Brown that although they could not block Mr Martin’s peerage, he might not pass their test of propriety.

A source at the House of Lords said, “They considered the possible impact of public controversy on the reputation of the Lords. There were causes for concern that were drawn to the Prime Minister’s attention.

‘It is for the House of Commons to put forward a nomination. They could have put it to the vote but they did not.” (That’s democracy for you!).

A spokesperson at the Appointments Commission said, ‘We do vet candidates. The Speaker is a special case but we did the usual checks.’ (Obviously not well enough but then again, they probably asked Gordon Brown!)

And a spokesperson for Downing Street said, ‘This decision was taken on the basis of a recommendation by the whole House of Commons in an uncontested motion.’

Erm…. the motion was uncontested because there was no vote!

So a man who tries to cover up the expenses scandal, because he is also in it up to his eyeballs, gets a peerage?

There you have it folks, you too can be a speaker in the House of Traitors, fail to do your job properly in regards to overseeing the expenses of MPs (which is one of the roles of the speaker!) and get a nice little peerage which means you may not ever have to turn up in the House of the “Highfaluting” Lords. (But still get paid!)

Then a few politicians/media come out and say that MPs/Speakers/Lords are out of touch with the public. I can’t see why that would be, can you?

Drug Addict Shoots Child!

A young boy, aged 12, was shot in the stomach by a junkie “drug addict” using an air gun.

The incident, which took place on January the 28th in Stanley, Perthshire, was due to the valium/ diazepam loaded addict disliking the “noise” the youngster was making on his toy motorbike.

Steven Urquhart, who is 22, was jailed for an extremely lenient short sentence of just 9months!

Sheriff Robert McCreadie said the junkies’ behaviour was “extraordinary” and that Urquhart had committed a “wicked” offence which could have had disastrous consequences.

No kidding Sherlock!

At Perth Sheriff Court, Sheriff McCreadie said: “It is a serious matter to discharge a weapon at a 12-year-old boy not knowing where that pellet would end up.

“He should not be using drugs and then carrying an airgun which he recklessly discharged at a 12-year-old boy. It was extraordinary behaviour.

“This was apparently committed after you had taken a substantial amount of valium. Whether you were aware of what you were doing is debatable.

“Who knows what part of the body pellets might have hit. You could easily have hit his face with potentially very serious consequences. Your actions were clearly wicked.”

Another Imported Sex Fiend!

A foreign male “carer” that was working at a nursing home in Edinburgh carried out a sick, twisted sexual assault 76 year old elderly female patient as the pensioner clung onto her Zimmer frame.

The elderly victim later informed another employee that Joseph Sinja had “done things her husband wouldn’t do”.

Sinja a 32 year old Kenyan national admitted carrying out the attack on April 26th 2009 when he appeared at the High Court in Edinburgh.

This monstrous attacker will be sentenced at a later date, but the Kenyan national was warned that he could be deported – but I very much doubt it!

We have great admiration for this brave lady that was able to speak up about this vile, sexual assault and hope she is doing well.

N.B. News in brief is a compilation of articles which in no way are associated with each other and are intended to inform the reader.

As reported on the main BNP website, 7 out of 10 jobs are taken by migrants. If that is not sickening enough to the unemployed, up to 10,000 “highly skilled” migrants could claim compensation from the government, aka taxpayer, aka YOU, because the High Court ruled that the changes the government made to the migrant workers rules were UNFAIR!

Skilled migrants used to have to wait four years before they could permanently live in the UK. The government changed this to five years and the High Court said that this was “unlawful” as there were migrants who had to reapply under these new “stricter” rules.

At the High Court yesterday, Judge Cox said that the changes were still unfair and that the court MUST intervene. She said: “It would be unlawful for the [home secretary] to withhold indefinite leave to remain from all those members of the highly skilled migrant programme who were already on the scheme before 3 April 2006, by reference to a qualifying period of five years’ continuous residence.”

The Home Office has said that they will not challenge this decision.

In April 2008, the High Court ruled that the changes to the programme that immigration minister Liam Byrne made in 2006 were unfair as migrant workers already in the UK had to reapply under these stricter new rules.

The initial challenge against the government was from the Highly Skilled Migrant Programme Forum who was unsatisfied that the changes were fair and went back to the High Court for another ruling.

The executive director of the forum, Amity Kapadia, said that the new ruling was a “landmark victory”.

He went on to say, “The Home Office’s continued attempt to apply policies that cannot withstand legal scrutiny suggests that there is a dearth of skilled policy makers and ministers”.

So not only do foreigners get specialised help in finding jobs and take 7 out of 10 new jobs, but they also get to claim compensation because they have to reapply to live in Britain!

I’m sorry, but the old phrase of “charity begins at home” applies here.

If five years ago you would have been told that the native people of Britain would be discriminated against in favour of foreigners, you would have thought that person was crazy and that, in good old Blighty, we look after our own.

What is going to happen to us in the next five years, God only knows, but the people of Britain have a lifeline. A chance to stop all this PC nonsense, to stop this discrimination and to stop the destruction of our society.

That lifeline is The British National Party.

British jobs for British workers – when we say it, WE MEAN IT!