It is with regret that I have accepted the resignation of Alastair Harper from the position of Press Officer Scotland. His reason for stepping down stems from a conflict of interest which has arisen between his long-standing commitment as a political commentator whose special interests in demography, evolutionary biology and education call for a measure of distance from political activism. However he has expressed to me his continuing belief in the values of British nationalism and his hopes for a British National Party representation in the next EU Parliament.

I would like to thank Alastair for his contribution in helping to rebuild the BNP here in Scotland over the last year and wish him all the best for the future. Our new Scottish press officer will be anounced soon.

Gary Raikes

Dutch politician Geert Wilders has become the latest missile in a global war between two civilisations. Without wishing to seem pedantic and pointing out the obvious this is of course the conflict between Western Civil Society and traditional Islam. Wilders, now in hiding and under continual armed guard due to death threats, recently released a short film entitled ‘Fitna’ (‘strife’ in Arabic) over the Internet. Juxtaposing images of Muslim violence with quotes from the Koran, fury followed in its wake and the film declared grossly offensive. Now the odd thing here, given that Muslims live in a permanent state of ‘deeply offended’ anyway, is that they often refer to these same passages as perfectly acceptable validations for their actions, so simply illustrating this correlation in a film would seem uncontroversial. Contentious or not, however, one would definitely envisage politicians and journalists in every free society defending Wilders right to make such a film. Well not here… you’d have to take a trip to another planet where its inhabitants did not happily renounce their most fundamental freedoms in the name of ‘religious sensitivity’.

Take a look at the world’s response to Fitna. The Dutch government sought to ban it outright, and EU ministers publicly condemned it, as did UN Secretary-General Ban (no pun intended) Ki-moon. Dutch television refused to broadcast it and when Wilders declared his intention of airing it over the Internet his American web-host Network Solutions closed down his website. All this happened before the proposal to show the film at a private viewing in the House of Lords and when Wilders attempted to enter Britain to host Fitna and answer any questions about it he was promptly arrested at the airport and detained there until the next convenient plane arrived to take him home.

Predictably (yawn) there were instantaneous calls for an embargo of Dutch products throughout the Muslim world, and several Muslim countries blocked ‘You Tube’ in the endeavour to save their populations from the indignation of Wilders’ blasphemy penetrating their minds. Next followed isolated protests, attacks on embassies and ubiquitous demands for Wilders’ murder, although it must be said that nothing has yet occurred to rival the ferocious response to the Danish cartoons.

In the interim, incidentally, one of the Danish cartoonists threatened to sue Wilders for breach of copyright because he’d used the bomb-laden image of Mohammed in Fitna without permission. This said cartoonist has also been living in hiding since the publication of the cartoons in 2006. Ironically there does seem something rather amusing about one hunted man unable to venture out in public for fear of being killed by religious lunatics, threatening to sue another man in the same sticky situation over a copyright violation!

Wilders and indeed the Danish cartoonists have all been extensively vilified for ‘seeking to inflame’ the Muslim community. Even if this had been Wilders’ objective this condemnation represents an astounding concurrence of moral blindness and political incautiousness. The point is not (and never will be) that some free person spoke, or wrote, or illustrated in such a manner as to inflame the Muslim community. The point is that only the Muslim community is flammable in this way. The storm over Fitna like all such controversies renders one fact about our world especially significant: Muslims appear to be far more concerned about perceived slights to their religion than about the atrocities committed daily in its name. Our accommodation of this psychopathic skewing of priorities has, more and more, taken the form of spineless, blinkered, submission and compliance.

Another irony arises here that cannot have gone unnoticed. In the face of all provocations the position of the Muslim community appears to be; ‘Islam is a religion of peace, and if you say that it isn’t we will kill you’. Of course the reality is often more shaded, but this is about as shaded as it ever gets ‘ Islam is a religion of peace, and if you say that it isn’t, we peaceful Muslims cannot be held responsible for what our less peaceful brothers and sisters do. When they burn your embassies, or kidnap and slaughter your journalists, know that we will hold you first and foremost accountable and will use the bulk of our energies criticising you for ‘racism’ and ‘Islamophobia.’’

Submission in the face of these threats has a chilling effect on the exercise of free speech. Failure of Western governments to make it safe for people to speak openly about the problem of Islam could be a matter of finance perhaps? They cannot afford to protect every person who speaks out against Muslim intolerance. No this is not the problem…the problem is that so few people do speak out, if there were tens of thousands of voices the risk to each would be radically reduced, and those who do are persecuted by not only the Muslim community but by their own governments as well.

While it remains taboo to criticise religious faith in general, it is considered especially unwise to criticise Islam. Only Muslims hound and hunt their apostates, infidels, and critics in the 21st century. There are to be sure reasons why this is so. Some of these reasons have to do with accidents of history and geopolitics, but others can be directly traced to doctrines sanctifying violence, which are unique to Islam.

What about the allegedly ‘moderate’ Muslims, all those civil, freedom loving reasonable Muslims, the ones who are just as appalled by intolerance as I am? By the law of averages alone there must be some, but vocal moderates are very hard to find. Wherever ‘moderate Islam’ does announce itself, one often discovers frank Islamism lurking just a euphemism or two beneath the surface.

The subterfuge is rendered all but invisible to the general public by political correctness, wishful thinking, and ‘white guilt.’ This is where we find sinister people successfully posing as ‘moderates’. Take a good long hard look at the members who comprise The Muslim Council of Great Britain, they are an Islamist public relations organisation posing as a civil-rights lobby.

The association between the doctrine of Islam and Islamic violence is simply not open to dispute. Muslims themselves acknowledge and demonstrate this connection at every possible opportunity and to deny it is to retreat into a fantasy world of political correctness and religious apology. Liberalist talk of how benign Islam ‘really’ is and about how the problem of fundamentalism exists in all religions only obfuscates what may be the most pressing issue of our time.

Islam as it is currently understood and practiced by vast numbers, is antithetical to civil society. A recent poll showed that thirty-six percent of British Muslims (ages 16-24) believe that a person should be killed for leaving the faith. Sixty-eight percent of British Muslims feel that their neighbours who insult Islam should be arrested and prosecuted, and seventy-eight percent think that the Danish cartoonists should have been brought to justice. These are so called British Muslims, if there is such a thing.

The Muslim community is continuously exempted from paying any respect to Western standards of moral order in the name of cultural relativism which turns things completely upside down, and it is us in the end who are forced to ‘respect’ the glaring pathologies in their culture.

The lesson we should draw from the Fitna debacle is that we need more criticism of Islam, not less. Let it come down in such torrents that not even the most deluded Muslim could conceive of containing it. There is no such ‘right’ as the ‘right’ not to be offended; indeed I am deeply offended by the contents of the Koran with its overt hatred of Christians, Jews, apostates, non-believers and homosexuals, but cannot demand its suppression.

It is time we recognized that those who claim ‘the right not to be offended’ have also chillingly announced their hatred of Western Civilisation and will stop at nothing in order to triumph.

Published Date: 25 February 2009 The Scotsman

The last time the Home Office produced an estimate on the number of immigrants coming to Britain was in May 2004 on the accession of eastern European countries and others to the EU.
Then, the Home Office believed the number of immigrants seeking entry to Britain would not exceed 13,000.

As it happened the numbers hit circa 80,000 for the year. For Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, to estimate that she will “almost halve the numbers” of highly qualified immigrants to Britain from 26,000 to 14,000 is just another example of official blarney (your report, 23 February).

It is not surprising that in unreported English local government by-election contests in the past three months, the number of victories and close seconds secured by the British National Party is driving the Labour government to crank up its pie-crust promises on immigration curbs.

The electorate, however, will not be duped. Too many broken promises, too many jobs lost to non-British workers.

The predictable outpouring of unsubstantiated invective on Michael Smith’s prospective candidature on behalf of the British National Party in Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath indicates the inability of the S.N.P. and NuLabour spokesmen to engage in any rational criticism of the programme of the British National Party. To do so would be to reveal that behind their fishwives’ defamations there is an absence of argument, and the reason for that is because the liberal/Marxist fundamentals on which our present LibLabCon regime are based are false and hopelessly fractured.
Primarily their kneejerk description of the British National Party as “fascist” avoids the historical fact that fascism as a political dogma has been dead for over sixty years. They are fighting yesterday’s battles.
If they are to be considered anything better than parrots they have to discuss the written and spoken record of the British National Party 2008 where they will appreciate that this Party alone, beyond the criminal conspiracy which is today’s LibLabCon regime, stands for the identity, freedom and ultimately the very survival of the British peoples against frightful odds.
Michael Smith in his measured statement rightly refers to his sense of disillusionment. Countless thousands of other British people feel similarly today as they perceive their once beloved country overrun by uncontrolled waves of the world’s refugees. History has destined us to afford this world a living and thus our overcrowded nation is sinking into bankruptcy and disintegration.
To this disaster we must add the certainty that our British identity as a nation state is being sucked away into what even the most complacent will see to be the EUSSR, alias the Eurostate.
Democratic free-speech is challenged and the dubious behaviour of our judicial system and its police service is everywhere contributing to a break-down of law and order.
The loss of our manufacturing, fisheries and agriculture to the false god of globalisation is something which we are presently just beginning to experience. To believe as the present
regime would have us that we can survive by taking in each other’s washing shows how far we have been conned.
When despairing citizens consult the cogent and closely reasoned Statement of the British National Party they will come to realise that the deep undercurrent of frustration and anger that is building up in the British people as a result of the treacherous behaviour of corrupt politicians has found the answer in that Party.
Michael Smith is the first protagonist in this great struggle in Scotland to champion the belief in the freedom and identity of the British people. He will, as events will show, not be the last.

It would appear that we are witnessing a political metamorphosis with the arrest and nine hour detention of Tory Immigration spokesman Damian Green by what many will be calling the New Labour-Stasi-type police, alias the counter-terrorism squad.

Because Damian Green had British public interest as his first concern and spoke out on assured facts on the nightmare which is the present state of immigration in this country, the Labour Home Secretary and the police spectacularly took what will yet prove to be a deeply damaging action.

On Nov. 2007 a Home Office memo showed that the Home Secretary had been warned four months earlier that thousands of illegal immigrants had been cleared to work in sensitive Whitehall jobs.

On 10th Feb. this year the then Home Office Minister received an email revealing that an illegal Brazilian immigrant had faked an identity pass to obtain work in Parliament. The memo was published in the Sunday Telegraph and Liam Byrne was informed of it on the 31st. Jan. Byrne was accused of a cover-up.

It is no coincidence that this arrest has been made just before a mini-recess in Parliament which will deny searching questions being asked in the House immediately. Over the past year your paper has published letters highlighting the rise in New Labour political oppressiveness and intrusions of individual liberty.

The Government’s transparent policy, both positive and by default, of changing the historic identity of the British peoples by unlimited immigration has been cranked up just that degree or so more by the scandalous arrest of Damian Green. It is to be hoped that this action will shake multitudes of the complacent from their all-too-long comfort zones.

It is clear that Scotland is being colonised by increasing numbers of Islamic settlers radiating from Greater Glasgow.
The Scottish Islamic Foundation Conference is this year being held at Hampden Park on St. Andrew’s Day, 30th November.

It should not pass our notice that Osama Saeed’s Scottish Islamic Foundation has deliberately appropriated, St.Andrew’s Day and Hampden Park, to celebrate its Islamic religious and political identity so now it is plain the Islamisation of Europe has spread to Scotland.

Alex Salmond and Osama Saeed seem to have sealed a pact to encourage the increase of Scotland’s 50,000 Muslim population.

Alex Salmond has this year provided £600,000 of Scottish taxpayers’ money to further the interests of the Scottish Islamic Foundation and it does not require prolonged thought to conclude that in return the highly regulated Muslims will vote en bloc for the SNP.

The Scottish National Party is wilfully misnamed for it is in reality the Scottish Separatist Party pledged to destroy that age-long ethnic alliance of Scots, English, Irish and Welsh, which the world knows as the British people.

To be a Scot you must be born a Scot. Blood, parentage and ancestry are needed to prove that you belong to that nation which has occupied Caledonia since the end of the last Ice Age 7000 years ago.

Alex Salmond would have us follow the falsehood of “civic” nationalism. To him it is enough to be resident in Scotland to be accepted as a Scot; therefore “Come Ye All”, Somalis, Turks, Kurds, Arabs, Bangladeshis, Indians, Pakistanis, Chinese and Africans, a Scottish heritage is yours for the taking.

Ponder for a moment some scientific facts of demography, the study of populations, bad news for anyone of us ethnic Scots who treasures his “ain folk” and the future of our Scottish bairns.

The total fertility rate of our native Scottish women is c. 1.3 children. The total fertility rate of Pakistani women resident in Scotland is presently just under 5.0 children. Other immigrant ethnic groups parade fertility rates intermediate between indigenous Scotswomen and Muslim Pakistanis.

As demographers see it, we are now engaged in the Battle of the Birth Rates. Given the disparity between Muslim birth rates and those of the indigenous Scots , we, the ethnic Scots, are almost certain to be out-bred by the middle of this century.

Alex Salmond, as a statistician, is aware of these facts but is suppressing them for political ends which will have a fatal outcome for us native Scots. We demand that he ceases his favouritism of non-indigenous people in Scotland, particularly the Muslim population.

Charity begins at home and financial support must go, first and foremost, to our native Scots in these difficult times. That is the action of true Nationalism.

Let it be known, by whatever means, that St. Andrew’s Day and Hampden Park are sacred symbols of our Scottish identity which must not be adulterated in any way.

It is clear that Scotland is being colonised by increasing numbers of Islamic settlers radiating from Greater Glasgow.
The Scottish Islamic Foundation Conference is this year being held at Hampden Park on St. Andrew’s Day, 30th November.

It should not pass our notice that Osama Saeed’s Scottish Islamic Foundation has deliberately appropriated, St.Andrew’s Day and Hampden Park, to celebrate its Islamic religious and political identity so now it is plain the Islamisation of Europe has spread to Scotland.

Alex Salmond and Osama Saeed seem to have sealed a pact to encourage the increase of Scotland’s 50,000 Muslim population.

Alex Salmond has this year provided £600,000 of Scottish taxpayers’ money to further the interests of the Scottish Islamic Foundation and it does not require prolonged thought to conclude that in return the highly regulated Muslims will vote en bloc for the SNP.

The Scottish National Party is wilfully misnamed for it is in reality the Scottish Separatist Party pledged to destroy that age-long ethnic alliance of Scots, English, Irish and Welsh, which the world knows as the British people.

To be a Scot you must be born a Scot. Blood, parentage and ancestry are needed to prove that you belong to that nation which has occupied Caledonia since the end of the last Ice Age 7000 years ago.

Alex Salmond would have us follow the falsehood of “civic” nationalism. To him it is enough to be resident in Scotland to be accepted as a Scot; therefore “Come Ye All”, Somalis, Turks, Kurds, Arabs, Bangladeshis, Indians, Pakistanis, Chinese and Africans, a Scottish heritage is yours for the taking.

Ponder for a moment some scientific facts of demography, the study of populations, bad news for anyone of us ethnic Scots who treasures his “ain folk” and the future of our Scottish bairns.

The total fertility rate of our native Scottish women is c. 1.3 children. The total fertility rate of Pakistani women resident in Scotland is presently just under 5.0 children. Other immigrant ethnic groups parade fertility rates intermediate between indigenous Scotswomen and Muslim Pakistanis.

As demographers see it, we are now engaged in the Battle of the Birth Rates. Given the disparity between Muslim birth rates and those of the indigenous Scots , we, the ethnic Scots, are almost certain to be out-bred by the middle of this century.

Alex Salmond, as a statistician, is aware of these facts but is suppressing them for political ends which will have a fatal outcome for us native Scots. We demand that he ceases his favouritism of non-indigenous people in Scotland, particularly the Muslim population.

Charity begins at home and financial support must go, first and foremost, to our native Scots in these difficult times. That is the action of true Nationalism.

Let it be known, by whatever means, that St. Andrew’s Day and Hampden Park are sacred symbols of our Scottish identity which must not be adulterated in any way.

Press Officer

I am a profound admirer of the critic Quentin Letts whose article in the Mail recently should be everyone’s recommended read.

His perceptive eye sees into the ugliness, dishonesty and cruelty of our society.

His review of the revolting exhibition of Chinese exhibits in the new gallery of the ”art” dealer Charles Saatchi is in itself a profound insight into the psychopathology that has stricken the mentality of 21st c.” Broken Britain”.

Let us not be deceived into thinking that there is some hidden, wondrous aesthetic in the grotesque parade of decadence in the Saatchi Gallery. The liberal/leftie cultural snobs who revel in this filth look askance at those of us who do not see the inner beauty in a dog poo.

This exhibition has one virtue. It reveals to those of us who have some element of clear-eyed, traditional vision that we are looking at an exhibition of art in crisis and art bespeaks the soul of a nation and its people.

There can be no doubt that many people realise that our age is sick. They realise that we are encountering phenomena in the field of art that have no parallel in the history of man.

These are so eloquent of the disturbance in the world of the spirit and in everyday life that when the crisis that we are living through breaks, as it may well do very soon, we will marvel at our own failure to learn the full truth from what art has made so plain.

nguage: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;”>Perhaps Saatchi and his decadent display are giving us an unconscious warning.

And a letter supporting the above.

With interest I read your letter to the ‘Mail’.   The  Saatchi Show is indeed revolting and  a symbol, as you imply, of a sick social order.

Art in our society has become so perverted that not only bad art has come to be considered good, but even the very perception of what art really is has been lost.  The capacity of a work of art to evoke an aesthetic experience is not of positive value unless the experience itself has value. 

What I ‘m trying to say is that the aesthetic experience should refine perception and discrimination, if we can be made more sensitive by it then it would have a wide bearing upon all other aspects of our lives.  If on the other hand we are brutalised by it then it is no more relevant than waking up with a hangover, i.e. the after effects are negative.

The only theory of art that I can think this show fits into is George Dickie’s Institutional Theory simply because it is in a gallery and endorsed by a so called ‘Art World’. 

Yours in agreement…Bea.

Gordon Brown announced in his Party Conference speech that his Home Access Project will see £300 millions spent on providing free computers and broadband interent access to families so that they can enhance their learning at home.

This, on the surface, seems all very well but I am reminded of the line from Virgil’s Aeneid: “Whatever it is I fear the Greeks even when they bring  gifts”.

Let us look a little closer. As we all know there’s no such thing as a free lunch. According to BECTA, “Bringing educational creativity to all” the Government’s Home  Access Taskforce, it will be necessary “to reduce availability, restrict access and increase resistance to harmful and inappropriate material on line”. We all immediately jump to the conclusion that Taskforce has hard-core porography in mind.

However, which political party or parties will the Taskforce deem “harmful and inappropriate”? No prizes here!

The essence of Orwell’s “1984″ and the nightmare of thought-control which Gordon Brown’s poisonous offering of free internet access contains is testament to the demonic genius of the man.

Press Officer.

Most assuredly Anne Marie Keenan is not alone in her concern at the politically directed silence in the matter of ascendant Islam in Western society.

By far the most troubling evidence of Islamic colonisation of Britain, and indeed of Western Europe, is the demographic facts of disparate birth rates between indigenous British and Muslim women.

In the latest O.N.S. population report it is stated that”foreign” women, on average, have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost 5. for Pakistani women. When one remembers that indigenous British women presently have a t.f.r. of 1.3 children it is not difficult to agree with  Col. Muammar Gaddafi when he gave voice to the following,recently on Al Jazeera  TV,”There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe, without guns, without swords, without conquests. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent in three decades”.

In Britain the cities of Leicester, and Birmingham are contesting candidates for imminent Muslim majority populations within this decade.

The studied unwillingness to discuss the Islamification of Britain is sinister and well merits the concern of so many undisclosed Britons.

Scottish Office Press Officer

The British National Party is a political party for indigenous Britons. It is founded as all nationalist parties are on historical ethnic foundations.

The SNP, as regularly announced by its publicists, is a civic nationalist party. That contradiction means that anyone, of any racial origin, can call him or herself Scottish merely by living here. This blatant tosh was exemplified a year or two ago when that splendid example of Scottish womanhood, Roseanna Cunningham said that Scotland required an annual inflow of 50,000 Chinese.
If the SNP has its way Scotland will be swamped by every race under the sun and in the words of that vile mouth from Dundee, Andrew Marr, “widespread and vigorous miscegenation is the answer”. Guardian 28.2.99. Salmond’s civic nationalism is the surest prescription for the disappearance of the Scots as they have been known.
The British National Party has vowed to keep Britain British in the fullest sense of the word.

Disquieting is scarcely the word to describe the
threatening results of a YouGov Poll of 1400 students
in 12 English universities with influential Islamic
societies. Of the total students polled 600 were
Muslim.
Hannah Stuart who conducted the poll for the Centre
for Social Cohesion said, “These findings are deeply
alarming. Students in higher education are the future
leaders of their communities, yet significant numbers
of them appear to hold beliefs, which contravene
liberal, democratic values.
60% of students active in Islamic societies felt
killing for religion could be justified, 59% thought
women should wear the veil and 50% said they would not
support a friend’s decision to leave Islam.”
These findings underline what many have been saying
for some time now in this matter. In Britain we have
aspired to the status of a democracy. Islam is a
theocracy and as such is a contradiction to the basic
principles of our political system
How long are the British people, and I mean the
indigenous British, going to continue the acceptance of
a growing, parallel society in our midst, which, if we
are permitted to express the belief, threatens our
traditional way of life and the ethnic balance of our
nation.
The facts of demography make it very plain that
Muslims within the next two decades will become a
majority in significant areas of the United Kingdom
and, given their isolationist mentality, nothing good
can come of this for the indigenous British.
Multiculturalism here is revealing itself for the
tragedy it has shown itself to be everywhere different
races and religions are forced together.

Press Officer

It is alarming that despite the certain knowledge that a net 75 million more people appear on planet Earth every year requiring food and resources, whose sum total declines in equal measure, no word of this has been mentioned at the G8 Summit talking shop at Hokkaido.

Diminishing world resources of all kinds become more expensive by the day. This latter fact has been admitted by G8 representatives only in voicing their selfish national interests. The root cause of the acute rise in demand for resources issuing from the exploding population numbers in the emerging new economies of China, India and South East Asia remains under wraps for fear that the logical succession in the discussion would be the issue of birth control in the Third World.

In the Developed World, particularly in Europe, populations are falling and total fertility rates are now well down below replacement levels. The exception to this trend is amongst Third World immigrants to Europe  who perpetuate the breeding habits of their societies of origin. A continuance of this demographic aspect will lead to a change in the ethnic balance of the West.

Financial and material aid to the Undeveloped World without the condition of birth restraint, particularly in Sub Saharan Africa, aggravates the problem of increasing poverty.

Ethiopia and the Sudan are prime examples of nations which critically require birth control to halt the inevitable and fatal advance of overpopulation.

In the readers’ letters page of this paper after the Gleneagles Summit in 2005 the question of why the overarching threat of Third World overpopulation was not raised there received no answer, nor today do any of the questions raised, rather timidly by that excellent pressure group, Optimum Population Trust.

The naked truth of the matter is that Third World overpopulation and the need to restrain its endless growth touches the raw nerve of world race relations and the imminence of a Coloured World Revolution now in evidence to those who are not blinded by the curse of political correctness.

Letter from press officer (published)

Education Secretary Fiona Hyslop calls for the principals of Scottish universities to “work harder” to banish “elitism” from our higher education by discriminating against higher achieving applicants to our universities, favouring instead those who come from the poorer echelons of society and more alarmingly irrespective of their intellectual status.  This is blatant class discrimination which, were it racial, would immediately open the proposer to criminal prosecution.

The class war origins of this pronouncement reveal how anti-national the present nationalist administration here in Scotland really is.

It should not be forgotten by the thousands of voters who adhere to the Scottish National Party that they are supporting a political organisation deeply imbued with  equalitarian, neo-Marxist motives identical to those which fuel the Scottish Socialist Party and the Left at large.

From the mid 1960’s when the Marxist-tainted “liberal”comprehensive school system was introduced Scottish education has steadily been degraded leaving us with a “wasted generation” pitiably bottoming out in the European educational leagues. This national scandal is the result of the equalitarian obsession with denying human differences. The nonsensical dogma that, by exposing every child to the same educational level and tempo identical results will be the outcome, shows how far commonsense  can be subverted by a political creed. As a result of this liberal/left regime our nation has been denied the skills of the artisan class which once made us the front-runners of European manufacturing.

We need excellence wherever it can be found and from whatever class of our nation. The only discrimination we should make is in favour of talent and that should be pursued at whatever cost.

David Fordyce

Scottish Press Officer

Once more into the breach, dear friends!

John R. Nicoll, whilst absolutely right in his assertion that “our catastrophic P.M. Gordon Brown” is railroading us into the E.U.S.S.R., which is what the E.U. exactly amounts to, gets a wee bit mixed up about the historical importance of Senator Joseph McCarthy.

In 1946, after it became clear that the West had been grievously out-manoeuvred at Yalta and Teheran by the combination of a satanic Stalin and a dementiac Roosevelt, voices were raised in protest against the penetration of many critical elements of American society and government by treasonable Marxist elements.

Senator Joseph McCarthy took the patriotic initiative to denounce these toxic organisms in the American media, Hollywood, the arts, the US legal system et al.

His robust denunciations were too much for the lily-livered liberals in the Democratic Party and in the subterranean Left and the united forces of Un-American Activities worked not unsuccessfully for his destruction.

However, his warning call was not wasted on the American people in general and the advance of the seditious liberal/Left was delayed for decades.

As far as can be observed today, apart from the British National Party and a happily growing number of influential journalists and writers, there are no voices in th Lib-Lab-Con Axis to duplicate Senator McCarthy’s crusade against the treacherous anti-British elements which are presently driving our nation to political, economic and moral destruction.

David Fordyce

Dear Editior,

Your report that Trevor Phillips, the Chairman for the Commission of Equality and Human Rights has produced a moral gaffe beyond belief even for some one as hysterical as he makes it clear how far the remarkable results produced by the British National Party in the recent English Local Government Elections have had on him and doubtless those of his persuasion. He actually said that the British National Party and its supporters should be treated as “less than human”.

Before the final total of votes cast for the British National Party in this recent electoral contest is made public it can be forecast that the 654 candidates are expected to have polled between a quarter and a half a million votes.

Where in Manifesto, spoken word or action is there any justification for this deliberate demonising of a party which is seen by a rapidly increasing number of people in Britain as a beacon of hope for many and a frightening nemesis for the LibLabCon Axis?

Press Officer

If you would like to contact us and discuss issues about the party please email the Press Officer

How hypocritical can the Cameron Tories get?

In an effort to persuade the distressed masses of indigenous Britons in the English cities that the immigration crisis is the fault of Nu-Labour the Tories are demanding “restrictions” on migrant levels. It has taken them a long time to come around to this assertion.

The Tories should come clean on the issue of immigration to this country. They are every bit as culpable as Nu-Labour in opening the floodgates of the UK to the mass immigration which is damaging not only our economy and social structure but the very identity of the British people.

When the mouthpieces of the LibLabCon Axis point out to the British electorate that because the reproductive rates of indigenous and immigrant women are so widely different that it is only a matter of five or six decades until the native English will be a minority in their own country we will then know that they talking sense and not their usual hot air.

Press Officer

If you would like to contact us and discuss issues about the party please email the Press Officer

Billy Bragg can orate as long as he likes about his “England” but the observable message that comes through from this bilious Marxist singer is that he has shunned the poor embattled folkish English he was raised amongst to bask in true celebrity style in a Dorset mansion overlooking the Channel. The England he proclaims in his “anthems” is now not an England of English people but a rapidly balkanising kingdom of every race on earth.

London, and more particularly Birmingham, are moving into a demographic situation where indigenous English will sooner than later be a minority in their own country.

It is for this reason that the British National Party is looming on the political horizon, a beacon of hope for many and a frightening nemesis for others.

Press Officer

If you would like to contact us and discuss issues about the party please email the Press Officer

Joyce McMillan once again contributes to the mood of depression sorely afflicting the British people today in her attack on things traditionally British, whether it be the memories of the Empire or the celebration of the Last Night of the Proms.

Our morale as a nation has never been lower in centuries. Institutions like the family and our Protestant Churches are imploding, with our youth at best resentful and without respect and at worst, plain feral.The Primate of the Church of England recommends the acceptance of the first stage of an alien Islamic religio/legal practice, Sharia.Our politicians, from the Prime Minister down, have developed dissimulation to an unprecedented degree.

That the electorate continues to turn out at the quinquennial charades testifies to how punch-drunk we have become.In an analysis of the 635 Members of Parliament an astonishing preponderance of them reveal moral and legal anomalies which range from domestic violence, drunkenness to fraud. Just check them out! As physical obesity reaches record highs, illiteracy keeps pace. The annual whitewash cannot conceal our judicial system infected with irresolution in the face of crime and anarchy and the arm of the Law likewise neutered.

The traditional concept of being British, based on age old national and ethnic foundations, is being rapidly corroded to give way to the creation of a multiracial, globalist EUSSR which will separate us from our past and from each other.Joyce McMillan is one voice in a thousand agencies set to achieve this end.

Press Officer

If you would like to contact us and discuss issues about the party please email the Press Officer

For years now the media have harshly censored any positive contribution by the British National Party to the critical debate on mass immigration.This is not in accordance with the principles of a free press.

Now with the explosive findings of the House of Lords’ Economic Committee rejecting outright the Government argument that a high level of immigration is of economic benefit to the UK the protracted and reasoned stand of the British National Party in this critical issue over the past twenty years has been vindicated.

No doubt opposition critics of the British National Party will respond with the old chestnut that the arguments of the British National Party are not reasonable, without once citing an example from the writings or spoken statements of that organisation. Our “Voice of Freedom” and “Identity” contain monthly statements, not only on immigration but on all other matters essential to the existence and security of the British nation such as opposition to our further entry to the European Union and the need for our withdrawal from what the British National Party sees as the EUSSR.

Recent impressive electoral returns on the part of the British National Party and the growing realisation that the electorate is coming to regard that Party as the Opposition to what is now mockingly dubbed the LibLabCon Axis, cannot long delay, in the interests of honesty, if that is still regarded as a virtue, the acceptance that the British National Party is the 4th party in British politics, not a one trick pony like the UKIP but a rapidly expanding association of solid British citizens with sound views on all aspects of the degenerating life of Britain and its depressed, indigenous inhabitants.

Press Officer

If you would like to contact us and discuss issues about the party please email the Press Officer